Decisions
Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal decisions can be searched on the Federal Court website by selecting 'Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal' under 'Court'.
2023 |
2022 |
2021
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
2015 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 |
2009 |
2008 |
2007 |
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001
2000
1999 |
1994 |
1992 |
1991 |
1990 |
1989 |
1987 |
1986
| prior to 1985
-
Dunford v Chief of Army [2024] ADFDAT 1
DEFENCE AND WAR - appeal against conviction by Defence Force Magistrate (DFM) - where the applicant convicted of two counts of assault by unlawful touching - whether the convictions unreasonable or could not be supported having regard to the evidence - whether, on the whole of the evidence, there was a reasonable possibility that the touching was…
-
Poulton v Chief of Navy [2023] ADFDAT 1
DEFENCE AND WAR – appeal against conviction by Defence Force Magistrate (DFM) – where the appellant found guilty of committing an act of indecency without consent – where complainant alleged defendant entered her bed without consent and committed acts of sexual nature – whether conviction unreasonable, or cannot be supported, having regard to the…
-
Kearns v Chief of Army [2022] ADFDAT 3
DEFENCE AND WAR - appeal from a Defence Force Magistrate (DFM) - where the appellant was found guilty of assaulting a subordinate - Defence Force Discipline Act 1982 (Cth) (DFDA), s 34 - and of conduct prejudicial to the discipline of the Defence Force under DFDA, s 60 - Defence Force Discipline Appeals Act 1955 (Cth), ss 20, 23 (Appeals Act) -…
- Kantibye v Chief of Army [2022] ADFDAT 2
-
Kantibye v Chief of Army (No 2) [2022] ADFDAT 4
DEFENCE AND WAR - appeal against conviction by Defence Force Magistrate (DFM) - where appellant gave evidence at trial - where DFM gave self Liberato direction - formulation and application of Liberato direction - held that DFM conflated second and third limbs of Liberato direction and therefore did not in fact apply the direction - error of law - …
-
Private R Army v Chief of Army [2022] ADFDAT 1
DEFENCE AND WAR – appeal against conviction by Defence Force Magistrate – whether verdict was unreasonable or could not be supported, having regard to the evidence – whether in all the circumstances of the case the verdict was unsafe or unsatisfactory – where appellant alleges various inconsistencies and implausibilities in the evidence before the …
- Private R Army v Chief of Army [2021] ADFDAT 2
-
Howieson v Chief of Army [2021] ADFDAT 1
DEFENCE AND WAR - appeal from a General Court Martial - where the appellant was found guilty of prejudicial conduct per s 60(1) of the Defence Force Discipline Act 1982 (Cth) - where the prosecution had adduced tendency evidence to the effect that the appellant had a tendency to expose his penis to female members of the Papua New Guinea Defence…
-
Mikus v Chief of Army [2020] ADFDAT 1
DEFENCE AND WAR - appeal from a Defence Force Magistrate (DFM) - where the appellant was found guilty of assaulting a subordinate - Defence Force Discipline Act 1982 (Cth) (DFDA), s 34 - whether the reasons of the DFM for conviction were adequate - nature and source of obligation of a DFM to give reasons - Defence Force Discipline Appeals Act 1955 …
-
Boyson v Chief of Army [2019] ADFDAT 2
DEFENCE AND WAR - application for an extension of time to appeal from a General Court Martial ("GCM") - where the applicant was found guilty of one count of sexual intercourse without consent - whether the GCM's verdict was unreasonable and could not be supported by the evidence - whether the GCM's verdict was unsafe or unsatisfactory - where the…